Build the Next Generation of Games on QIE

In-game NFTs are typically issued through one of two Ethereum token standards, both of which work on any EVM-compatible chain including QIE. ERC-721 is used for unique, one-of-a-kind items like a specific character or rare weapon. ERC-1155 is used for items that exist in multiple copies, like stackable currency or common crafting materials, in a single contract. You deploy the minting contract with standard tools like Hardhat or Remix, then connect it to your game's inventory system so ownership shown in-game matches ownership on-chain.

It depends on what your game needs most. For frequent, low-value transactions like minting common items or paying small in-game fees, look for low average transaction costs and fast finality so players are not left waiting. For code portability, EVM compatibility matters, since it lets you reuse Solidity contracts and standard wallets like MetaMask instead of learning a new language. QIE is built around that combination: a published capacity of 25,000+ TPS, sub-2-second finality, an average fee of $0.0001, and full EVM compatibility. Weigh those specs against your game's actual transaction volume and existing tech stack rather than picking on reputation alone.

QIE does not currently publish its own Unity or Unreal plugin. Because QIE is fully EVM-compatible, standard Web3 integration approaches built for any EVM chain work the same way here: connect a wallet through WalletConnect or a similar library, point your RPC provider at QIE's network endpoint, and call your deployed smart contracts the same way you would on Ethereum or another EVM chain. Existing community Unity and Unreal Web3 plugins built for generic EVM support can be pointed at QIE by changing the network configuration, without needing a QIE-specific SDK.

Play-to-earn describes games where playing can produce assets, usually NFTs or tokens, that hold real value and can be traded or sold on a secondary market, rather than staying locked inside the game. Players typically earn these assets through gameplay milestones, competitions, or in-game economies, then trade them peer-to-peer or on a marketplace. It's worth noting that play-to-earn economies are only sustainable if enough real demand exists for the assets being earned. Studios should design the underlying economy carefully rather than assuming rewards alone will hold value long-term.

Cost depends on your contract's complexity and how many items you mint at once, but the network's average transaction fee sets the floor. On QIE, the average fee is $0.0001, compared to Ethereum's independently measured average of $0.17 as of August 31, 2026, per chainspect.app. That difference matters most for games minting frequently, common drops, crafting materials, or per-match rewards, where fees on a higher-cost network can outweigh the value of the item itself.

Not entirely, at least not on QIE today. There is no dedicated no-code blockchain game builder offered by QIE. You'll still need a game engine like Unity or Unreal for the game itself, and a Solidity smart contract for any on-chain assets. That said, the coding burden for the blockchain half is smaller than it sounds: template tools like OpenZeppelin's Contract Wizard can generate a standard, audited ERC-721 or ERC-1155 contract without writing one from scratch, which covers a large share of what most games actually need on-chain.